Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Substituting GPS for DME and ADF

I work with a lot of plane owners, and I have found the trend is to install an IFR GPS and skip having a DME in the plane. After all, the IFR GPS can be used in place of DME – right? Yes it can, but you had better have a clear understanding of how that substitution is to be done if you want to stay squeaky clean with the FAA.

The 2007 AIM, section 1-1-19 has information that every pilot flying with an IFR GPS should take the time to read. Specifically 1-1-19(f) talks about the substitution of an IFR GPS for DME or ADF. Before jumping into this discussion, it must be noted that your GPS must have a current database card.

Let’s look at the DME requirements first. Let me offer a caveat up front. I confess to having a difficult time following the AIM numbering scheme. Having said that, I will jump into this discussion, hoping I have the numbers right.

The first point to note is in AIM 1-1-19(f)(5). It says that in order to use the GPS for DME, the course deviation indicator (CDI) must be set to terminal sensitivity. This is normally 1 nm full-scale deflection. In most situations, the GPS receiver will already be in terminal mode. However, if it isn’t, then you will need to manually select terminal mode. To do this with the Garmin 400-500 series, go to the Aux 3 page and select CDI/Alarms.

This will allow you to manually select the CDI sensitivity. Select the 1.00 nm scale.

The caveat here is that you must not forget to restore it to AUTO once you no longer need it forcibly set to 1.0 nm sensitivity.

To manually select the CDI scale for the KLN89B, go to the NAV1 page. Turn the cursor on. Position it on the CDI Deviation Indicator and press CLR until it says CDI scale. Use the small knob to select the 1.0 nm sensitivity (ARM mode). Press CLR to return the display to the CDI Deviation Indicator and turn the cursor off. When the KLN89B is in Approach mode, it is not possible to select a less sensitive scale that the current one. The default sensitivity is 5.0 nm. Unlike the Garmin units, there is no AUTO mode.

The KLN94 CDI sensitivity is selected in the same manner. For both the Garmin and the KLN units, if the sensitivity has been manually set to 1.0 nm, the unit will go to a more sensitivity setting (approach mode), but it will not go to the enroute sensitivity (5 nm) until it has been reset to AUTO (Garmin) or 5.0 nm (KLN).

AIM 1-1-19(f)(c)(2)(b) talks about using GPS to fly a DME arc, and this is the one that is probably most frequently violated, albeit unintentional. It says, in part, with the boldface type from the AIM itself:

“You must select from the airborne database the facility providing the DME arc as the active GPS waypoint.
Note: The only acceptable facility is the DME facility on which the arc is based. If this facility is not in your airborne database, you are not authorized to perform this operation.”

What that means is you can’t just merrily load the approach and fly the arc using the Map page display and the suggested headings provided by the GPS, sequencing along from waypoint to waypoint. You have to keep the DME facility as your active waypoint. It is generally possible to do this and keep the waypoints, including the arc, visible in your Map display.

Let’s look at the VOR/DME-27 into Anoka (KANE) as an example of how to do this.

This approach incorporates a couple of different examples of using GPS for DME. To get started, let’s examine the use of the GPS to fly the DME arc. The first step in doing this is to load the approach into the GPS. By loading the full approach into the GPS, we get most of the waypoints as well as the arc displayed on the Map page. Also note that the GPS is in terminal mode sensitivity.

The problem however is that GEP, the facility that provides the DME information, is not the active waypoint. It is however the MAP waypoint for the hold. We can make it the active waypoint by going into FPL0, highlighting GEP and doing a DIRECT-TO.

By doing this, we still have the waypoints displayed on the Map page, but we have now satisfied the requirement to have the DME facility as the active waypoint. The arc can be flown using the Map for positional awareness and the waypoint distance to keep us within the proper arc distance.

Turning inbound on the final approach course, we are in VLOC mode and GEP is still the active waypoint. Now that we are no longer on the arc, we can go back to using the GPS waypoints. AIM 1-1-19 f(c)(1)(b) states:

“If the fix is identified by a five-letter name which is in the airborne database, you may select either the named fix or the DME facility as the active waypoint.”

This means that the fixes in the approach (TOURI, VOR10 and RW27) may be used in lieu of GEP and the DME distance.

By going to PROC and selecting Activate Vectors-To-Final, we can replace GEP with TOURI, the FAF, and start waypoint sequencing again. But be forewarned; because this is not a GPS approach, you must leave the CDI in VLOC mode so that guidance is being provided by GEP.

Now let’s look at another approach that might trip the unwary user depending on GPS to substitute for DME. Consider the ILS-27 into Anoka.

The trap here lies in the localizer-only approach. If you load this approach from the GPS database, the step-down fix KOGGE will not be one of the waypoints in the approach. This means that you must rely on DME to identify this fix, but the facility providing the DME is the localizer, I-ANE, rather than a VOR. You can get the proper DME distance by doing DIRECT-TO IANE in your GPS. Both the Garmin and the KLN units think IANE is an intersection, but it does give you the proper DME distance for a localizer-only approach. I did talk to Jeppesen about this approach. They do not include waypoints for step-down fixes for localizer-only approaches. However Jeppesen indicated there is some thought as to possibly including them in the future.

When substituting GPS for an ADF, it is not so detailed on instructions. The AIM says the NDB must be selected from the database and the receiver must be in terminal sensitivity. This might lead you to believe you can fly a pure NDB approach using the NDB as the active waypoint in the GPS and placing the unit in OBS (non-sequencing mode). Take the case of the NDB-28 approach for Osceola (KOEO).

By now you are probably asking yourself why would anyone choose to do this when there is a GPS-28 for Osceola? Well, for quite a while there was indeed an approach plate for GPS-28/OEO but there was no corresponding GPS approach in the database. Why? Because of a runway extension, the GPS-28 approach was NOTAM’ed as NOT AUTHORIZED. In this case, you had only one choice – the NDB-28. So trying to conform to the guidelines in the AIM, the NDB-28 approach is loaded. But now you run into yet another problem. AIM 1-1-19 (f)(b)6) says:

“Charted requirements for ADF and/or DME can be met using the GPS, except for use as the principle instrument approach navigation source.”

Now the conundrum – that ancient ADF receiver in your plane hasn’t worked in years. And even if it did work, you know that loading OEO into the GPS as the active waypoint, putting the receiver in OBS mode, and forcing it to terminal sensitivity is going to do a far better job of getting you into Osceola than that old ADF receiver. But unfortunately the AIM seems to say the FAA doesn’t see it that way.

This basically means that you can hold over a compass locator or NDB using GPS, and you can use it to identify a compass locator on an ILS or LOC approach. Returning to the ILS-27 into Anoka, the primary holding fix is GEP. But there is an alternate holding waypoint at the PNM NDB, which is about 30 nm northwest of Anoka.

You can use GPS to substitute for ADF in doing this hold. Again, the receiver must be set to terminal sensitivity. At the MAP waypoint for the ILS-27 into Anoka, the GPS receiver stops sequencing and waits for instructions from the pilot. If you press OBS on the Garmin units, it automatically brings up the waypoint for the published hold, which in this case is GEP. However you don’t want to go to GEP. So instead press DIRECT-TO. The GPS will display the waypoint for the published hold in the DIRECT-TO dialogue box, with the cursor on. All you have to do is put in PNM for the desired waypoint. The DIRECT-TO works on the KLN units as well.

So now you can head off to Princeton (KPNM) and enter the alternate hold. You can either do it by placing the GPS in OBS mode and flying the hold with raw data, so to speak, or you can load the NDB-15 approach at Princeton (KPNM) and go to PNM for the missed approach, since it is the same hold. Personally I would opt for the latter, since it depicts the hold.

To summarize substitution of an IFR GPS for DME and/or ADF:

  • Current database card
  • For use on a DME arc, the active waypoint must be the facility providing the DME
  • For DME waypoints (other than an arc), if the DME waypoint has an associated name in the database, you may use the database waypoint. If not, the waypoint must be identified using the DME facility as the active waypoint
  • The GPS may substitute for an NDB or compass locator except if it is the primary navigation source for an instrument approach
  • For use in lieu of both DME and ADF, the GPS must be in at least in terminal sensitivity (1 nm)

So now you have the nuts and bolts of substituting your IFR GPS for DME and/or ADF. Find a friend and go practice this ahead of time. Or better yet, find a good sim with a GPS and go practice these skills. Flying in the soup with a controller issuing rapid-fire instructions is not the time to be figuring out which buttons you need to push to substitute your GPS for DME or ADF.


john said...

Glad to see you're back. Your Blog is great source of tutorial material.

CApilot said...

Here is a question that I hope you or somebody else will be able to answer. I just came across an approach today where on the plan view in big bold wording it states: DME REQUIRED
Specifically, this is for the ILS or LOC RWY 3 OGDEN-HINCKLEY(OGD). Does this imply that you absolutely NEED dme for this approach? Or does GPS still constitute as a substitute in this case?

Linda said...

Sorry for being tardy in responding to your question about the ILS-LOC-3/OGD. I've been suffering Internet access problems, and much of the time do not have access. Hopefully it will soon be fixed.

I looked at this approach, and the only reason I can see for the DME requirement would be on the LOC flavor of this approach. The only way to determine the FAF and the MAP is via DME if you do not have an IFR GPS that has the approach waypoints. If you load the approach in the Garmin 430, you can see all the waypoints in FPL0. There is no step-down fix for the LOC only approach, so you could use the GPS. If you did not have an IFR GPS, then you would need to have the DME provided by the localizer.

For an older IFR GPS that does not provide non-GPS approaches, such as the KLN89B, I don't know if it would recognize IOGD as a waypoint in order to provide DME information. Certainly the KLN94 would, as well as the Garmin units.

I hope this helps.

PilotBrad said...

Fantastic stuff!

My IFR long x-country is scheduled for this weekend, and just the other day my instructor and I were reviewing the IAPs for one of our destinations questioning if the KLN89B could be used in lieu of DME, which the C172R I am flying does not have. He sent me home to figure it out, and your blog has helped clarify a lot of it for me. Thanks!

Malibu said...

The information here is out of date. The AIM has recently been changed to indicated that GPS may only be used on those approaches where "GPS" is included in the approach plate title (AIM 1-1-19(g)).

To poster CApilot, poster asking if you can substitute GPS where the approach says "DME Required", the answer is no. The KOGD approach is an ILS or LOC (not GPS) approach and you must have DME. Per the AIM, GPS may not be used for lateral navigation in the final approach segment. (AIM -1-2-3 (c)note 3).

Anonymous said...

Who knows where to download XRumer 5.0 Palladium?
Help, please. All recommend this program to effectively advertise on the Internet, this is the best program!

Anonymous said...

К слову сказать, лучший способ обезопасить себя от слежки - купить Подавители связи

PK said...

"To poster CApilot, poster asking if you can substitute GPS where the approach says 'DME Required', the answer is no."

Actually, the answer is yes.

"The KOGD approach is an ILS or LOC (not GPS) approach and you must have DME."

You need LOC for it. You do not need DME; you can substitute a qualified GPS for that. 2010 AIM 1-2-3(c) is clear about that.

"Per the AIM, GPS may not be used for lateral navigation in the final approach segment."

DME isn't for lateral navigation.


Ed said...

AIM 1-1-19(f)(c)(2)(b)

no longer has any comment about having to make the facility on which the arc is based the active waypoint. In fact flying an approach including an arc would be essentially impossible this way on a 430, as either you have the approach active (with the arc as a leg) or you have the facility as your active waypoint - but you can't do both at once. To fly the approach, you have to load its entirety from the database.

To fly some random, enroute arc, assuming that ever happened, you'd have to do it the way the previous AIM material suggested, since there would be no way to load it from the database.

Ellobo said...

Looking at KAVL ILS LOC 35 in bold is ADF required. Could you look at this an review. KAVL has Gone to only one ILS and GPS approaches to 35 and 17. The airfield closes at night and converts to G airspace. "CLASS C svc ctc APP CON svc (per twr/notam 1130–0400Z‡) other times CLASS G."